Some Canon and other lenses tested on a Canon 20D camera converted to IR with a 720nm filter.

Canon Lenses

EF 50mm 1.4 prime: Only good at f5.6 and below (possibly 2 stops more sensitive than EFS 18-55mm).

EF 17-40mm 4 USM L: at focal lengths less than 28mm OK at f8 and below; at focal lengths greater than 28mm OK at f11 and below, otherwise doubtful.

EFS 18-55mm 3.5-5.6: Good at f11 and lower f nos over 18-55mm; possible at f22 at 55mm.

EF 24-105 mm 4 IS USM L: Good at f8 and lower at 24-55mm; possible f5.6 and lower at 105mm; no use on high f nos. EF 70-200mm 4 IS USM L: Good at f4.5 70-100mm, possible at f8 over full range, otherwise no use.

EF 75-300mm 4-5.6 IS (old lens ca 1985): Good at f8 and below at 75mm; possible at f8 and below at 300mm. NON -CANON LENSES:

Sigma Lens 70-300mm APO DG 4-5.6: Good at f5.6 and f4.0 at 70mm; good at f11 and below at 300mm.

Pentax Super Takumar lenses ca 1965. 50mm 1.4; 28mm 3.5; and 135mm 3.5: all of these lenses perform well with either no or verlittle hot-spoting. However, there is no auto focus and no automatic evaluative metering.

Note on Methodology:

Testing was carried out by taking a series of shots at different aperture and focal length settings using a well lit scene having good tonal variation. Each image was then visually checked using Canon's Digital Photography Professional software, making alterations to enhance the presence any hot spot. An aperture/focal length combination was considered acceptable if there was either no hot spot visible at all or of such faintness that it could be easily missed.

Section headingEdit

Write the first section of your page here. Remember to include links to other pages on the wiki.

Section headingEdit

Write the second section of your page here. Do not forget to add a category to help people find the page.